I've seen people post of the benefits of going one tooth higher on the small sprocket (which gives the bikes more legs, less gear changes, more relaxed motorway and they claim that it calms down the leap off a closed throttle that every reviewer notes).
I've also seen at least one person post that going the other way, to lower gearing, one tooth, is a perfect solution: removal of the jumpy nature in 1st gear was also a claimed victory.
stock, it is a low geared bike. even urban you change 1st, 2nd, 3rd from light to light. So giving it longer legs makes sense.
But I'm trying to see how going the other way, a tad lower in gear, would improve the throttle touchy. Can both be an improvement? (ignoring cruise RPM advantages of taller gears).
I've also seen at least one person post that going the other way, to lower gearing, one tooth, is a perfect solution: removal of the jumpy nature in 1st gear was also a claimed victory.
stock, it is a low geared bike. even urban you change 1st, 2nd, 3rd from light to light. So giving it longer legs makes sense.
But I'm trying to see how going the other way, a tad lower in gear, would improve the throttle touchy. Can both be an improvement? (ignoring cruise RPM advantages of taller gears).